Wsvn iconWsvnSep 23, 2026 ~4 min source read

Pezeshkian’s UN address: Iran rejects U.S. threats, vows to fight ‘until our last breath’

At the U.N. General Assembly, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian delivered a wartime speech accusing the United States of terrorism, calling for diplomacy while rejecting threats from President Trump.

In defiant speech, Pezeshkian calls out Trump and says Iran will fight ‘until our last breath’

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Pezeshkian used a rare wartime address at the U.N. to accuse the U.S. of attacks on Iran and to present Iran as a victim of terrorism.

He explicitly called out President Trump after Trump said he might ‘annihilate’ Iran if no deal is reached, but Pezeshkian also signaled openness to diplomacy without accepting force.

Indirect, limited talks between U.S. envoys and lower-level Iranian officials occurred on the sidelines of the U.N., but Tehran framed them as routine and reiterated its conditions for negotiations.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian addressed the U.N. General Assembly in New York while Iran remains at war with the United States and Israel. The speech followed a U.S. presidential address in which President Donald Trump raised the possibility of "annihilating" the Islamic Republic if a diplomatic deal is not reached.

Pezeshkian framed Iran as a victim of terrorism by the United States. He called attention to Iranian civilian casualties early in the conflict, including more than 150 schoolchildren killed in the opening days, and displayed large photos of the late Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei alongside those victims.

He rejected labels that portray Iran as the aggressor: "We have only defended ourselves. We are not terrorists," he said at the General Assembly. He accused the United States and Israel of attacking Iran and added, "Yes they did hit us, but we did not bend the knee." Toward the end of the speech he named President Trump and said Iran is ready for dialogue "without accepting the language of force."

U.S. and Israeli officials condemned the address as hypocritical. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Iran lacks standing to lecture on human rights or the international system because, he said, Iran habitually violates them. The U.S. response underscored the diplomatic gulf between Tehran and Washington even as both sides engaged in limited contacts.

On the sidelines of the assembly, Trump told reporters that his envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, met indirectly with Iranian officials for about three hours. Trump described the meeting as "very good" but provided few details and said the Iranian participants were "not the highest level."

Iran's foreign ministry downplayed the meeting, calling it an indirect exchange conducted through Qatari mediators and insisting it did not alter Iran's bargaining position. Tehran reiterated demands that the United States lift its blockade of Iranian ports and release frozen Iranian assets.

Negotiations and the wider conflict

Pezeshkian's speech came after more than a year of starts and stops in negotiations between Iran and the United States. Intermittent attacks continued in the Strait of Hormuz, and commercial shipping remained below prewar levels. The address followed a previous period of heavy losses for Iran, including the assassination of senior military and political figures during a 12-day Israel-Iran confrontation last year.

  • Whether informal contacts at the U.N. lead to sustained, higher-level negotiations.
  • Any changes in U.S. demands or Iranian preconditions, particularly over the blockade and frozen assets.
  • Patterns of naval and commercial activity in the Strait of Hormuz, which remain a flashpoint for the conflict.

Pezeshkian used the U.N. platform to rebut U.S. threats directly and to claim moral legitimacy for Iran's wartime actions, while still signaling a willingness to talk — provided negotiations exclude coercive language and address Tehran's specific demands.

More context around this story.

Political Science in a Changing World
Youthkiawaaz iconYouthkiawaazSep 17, 2026

Political Science in a Changing World

Political Science in a Changing World: A Discipline of Possibilities, Employability and Leadership for the Youth of Tomorrow From Classrooms to Careers, from Democracy to Data: Expanding the Discipline and Opening New Pathways for the Next Generation Rethinking Political Science When students and parents hear Political

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app