A FDA advisory panel — the Medical Devices Advisory Committee's Molecular and Clinical Genetics Panel — reviewed Grail's premarket approval application for Galleri and voted that the benefits outweigh the potential risks for adults aged 50 years or older. The committee's votes were: unanimous that the test is safe, split 6–4 on efficacy, and 7–2 with one abstention that benefits outweigh risks.
Supporters pointed to the test's potential to find cancers that currently lack screening options. Panel member Danil V. Makarov, MD, said the ability to screen for cancers that previously were not screenable "would be a major contribution." Victor van Berkel, MD, PhD, also voted in favor but described his vote as hopeful: he said the test may prove beneficial over time for cancers without good screening tests, though that benefit is not yet proven.
Skeptical and cautious members questioned whether detecting more cancer signals now will translate into better long-term clinical outcomes. Multiple panelists called for stronger evidence that earlier detection via Galleri reduces advanced-stage disease or mortality.
Regulatory and practical implications
This is the first premarket approval application for a multicancer early detection (MCED) test submitted to FDA. If FDA follows the advisory panel and approves Galleri for the 50+ population, broader insurance coverage could follow. Several speakers during the day-long meeting included physicians, advocates, and patients who shared cases where Galleri signals preceded diagnosis of early-stage cancer.
Panelists who voted in favor urged robust post-market surveillance to confirm real-world benefit and to monitor downstream testing and outcomes. Those who voted against or withheld full endorsement highlighted the need for long-term outcome data showing that earlier detection with Galleri reduces late-stage disease or improves survival.
The advisory panel's recommendation favors conditional adoption for adults 50 and older because of potential to detect cancers with no current screening. The vote was not unanimous on effectiveness, and the panel called for careful follow-up, evidence collection, and clear clinical pathways for managing positive results.