Nbcdfw iconNbcdfwSep 24, 2026 ~6 min source read

Judge orders White House to restore CNN, MS NOW and Politico access; reporters briefly turned away before reentry

A federal judge temporarily reinstated credentials for three news outlets after President Trump revoked them; reporters were initially denied entry Thursday despite the order, then allowed back onto White House grounds later that day.

CNN, MS NOW and Politico allowed back at the White House after judge blocked Trump's ban

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly issued a 14-day temporary order restoring White House access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico while their First Amendment challenge proceeds.

The judge found the outlets likely to succeed on due process grounds and rejected the White House’s national security justification as inadequately supported.

White House press operations submitted a timeline saying badges were reactivated and returned to reporters after communication with the Secret Service.

# What happened

A federal judge temporarily restored White House access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico after President Trump revoked their credentials. The order gives the outlets 14 days of access while their legal challenge proceeds.

# Sequence of events

The judge, U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, wrote that the outlets were likely to succeed on the claim that their credentials were revoked without due process. He noted the outlets did not receive notice or an opportunity to be heard before the revocations.

The White House's press operations director, Micah Stopperich, filed a timeline saying staff were told shortly after 7 a.m. to restore access by turning on the reporters' hard badges. The Secret Service indicated the passes were reactivated shortly after 9 a.m., and that badges were dropped off at the entry gate for pick up within the hour.

Later that afternoon, CNN reporter Betsy Klein and MS NOW reporter Laura Barrón-López were on the White House grounds and reported live. Politico said one of its reporters was also granted access.

# Legal and constitutional findings

Judge Kelly's temporary restraining order framed the ban as probably unconstitutional, emphasizing due process concerns. The judge also rejected the White House's argument that the ban was based on national security, saying the administration provided little proof for that claim.

The news organizations—represented in filings by attorney Ted Boutrous—characterized the ban as retaliatory. Boutrous issued a statement praising the court's action as vindicating freedom of the press, due process and the rule of law.

# Administration's stated grounds

President Trump announced the ban on Truth Social, describing the outlets' reporting as "FAKE NEWS." The White House later sent letters to the outlets accusing them of publishing "sensitive security information, and misinformation" and cited specific articles involving munitions stockpiles affected by the Iran war, reporting on sanctions targeting Russia, a story about an East Wing renovation funding request, and coverage of negative reaction at a recent Republican midterm convention.

Trump spoke to reporters in the Oval Office after announcing the directive and said he did not want those outlets in the White House.

# Why this matters now

The court's temporary order restores immediate access and sets up a short legal window for the parties to litigate due process and First Amendment claims. How the administration responds in the coming days will determine whether the temporary restoration becomes permanent or if further restrictions are imposed pending full adjudication.

# Concrete developments to watch

  • Whether the administration files a motion seeking to overturn the temporary restraining order or offers a new, documented process for credential revocation.
  • Any further court rulings on the constitutional claims, especially on First Amendment retaliation versus legitimate security concerns.
  • How the White House implements or documents credential controls and whether the Secret Service or press office changes procedures for notifying reporters.

More context around this story.

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app