Phil Roberts of POET Systems argues that organisations generate many action plans but struggle to execute them because actions sit in silos. He says leaders need cross‑organisational visibility and clear ownership to sustain change; technology can help but leadership must demand transparency.
Action plans routinely stall because they are fragmented across departments and owned in isolation, making overall progress hard to see.
Visible, organisation‑wide tracking of actions creates accountability: when everyone can see who owns what and when it’s due, actions are less likely to slip.
Technology can aggregate plans into a single view, but a leadership commitment to transparency and responsibility is required to sustain change.
# The problem: plans multiply, progress disappears Most businesses create action plans after strategy meetings, improvement projects, management reviews and team discussions. They set tasks, assign owners and add dates. Yet Phil Roberts, managing director of POET Systems, says the frequent failure is not in plan creation — it's in execution.
Plans begin with energy but lose momentum. Actions slip, priorities shift, people get busy and initiatives drift. The common cause Roberts identifies is lack of visibility: multiple teams each keep their own lists, spreadsheets and systems. Engineering, HR, finance and operations all run parallel tracks that make sense locally but don't add up to a coherent picture for leaders.
# Why visibility matters If a CEO or managing director cannot quickly see all important actions across the business, they cannot identify overdue items, uneven responsibility or projects that are drifting. Lack of a single view lets important work disappear when individuals are absent or documents live on personal computers.
Roberts uses a river metaphor: individual actions are tributaries that should flow into larger organisational objectives. If they don't converge into a visible whole, their contribution to strategy is lost.
# Leadership before technology Roberts stresses this is primarily a leadership issue, not a technology one. The aim is transparency and accountability, not micromanagement. Leadership should be able to observe progress across functions — HR, finance, engineering, sales, operations — without interfering in every task. The visible record of what was agreed, who owns it and when it should be completed changes conversations and makes sustained change more likely.
# How technology helps Technology can provide the single pane of glass Roberts describes: an aggregated view where management can assess the health of improvement activity at a glance. POET Systems has developed and trademarked a concept they call Confluential Action Plans to give that visibility. The product idea is to bring disparate actions together so leaders can see connections, concentration of responsibility and deadlines across the business.
# The behavioural point: ownership drives change
# Practical implications for leaders
# Bottom line
Every company has a transformation agenda, whether it’s AI adoption, improved productivity , new operating models, or workforce agility. But for organizations with large frontline workforces, the real transformation test is what happens when a manager needs to fill an open shift at 7 a.m. That manager needs to know who
Why Do Organizations Struggle to Turn Strategy Into Action? Most organizations do not struggle to create strategies. They struggle to turn strategy into action. Organizations often develop ambitious strategic plans, long-term goals, and annual objectives, but those plans do not always reach the people responsible for e
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Eight questions to help you determine whether a strategy is bold enough to create meaningful growth—and realistic enough to execute.</span></p>
New business owners often face the same dilemma: spend time writing a business plan, or spend a week finding their first customers. So which one actually matters? Xero’s guide to writing an executive summary covers the how. But often, business owners ask a different question: Why? Does the planning itself really impact
Government efforts to accelerate housebuilding risk being undermined by a growing shortage of local authority planners, with new research suggesting councils need more than 2,600 additional staff to operate at full capacity. Planning departments across England and Wales are operating with around 80% of the staff they s
GUEST COLUMN:Matthew TossellCo-founder and ChairmanTailwind Group There comes a point in the development of many businesses when the founder can reasonably look around and say: I have done well. The danger is when that becomes: I have gone far enough. Wales has long debated the problem of the “missing middle”: indigeno
Loading more related stories...
Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.