September Orange Rag: What Law Firms Are Actually Doing with Legal Tech
A concise roundup of adoption trends, vendor moves, cost risks, security concerns and hard numbers from recent legal-technology activity described in the September Orange Rag.

A concise roundup of adoption trends, vendor moves, cost risks, security concerns and hard numbers from recent legal-technology activity described in the September Orange Rag.

GenAI dominated firm efforts: 40% of surveyed firms focused on generative AI over the past year while cloud apps/SaaS were second at 25%.
Adoption breadth lags: many tools are in use but few firms have deployed them to more than 30% of staff.
Vendors and firms are shifting to proprietary stacks and in-house model work, driven by rising token costs and control concerns.
# What the September Orange Rag reports
This month's Orange Rag compiles survey results, vendor moves and operational realities that should shape legal-technology planning for general counsel and firm leaders.
An ILTA survey asked 500 law firms which technological area they concentrated on over the past year. The headline numbers:
Those percentages show where attention and budgets went, but they also reveal a gap between interest and broad rollout. Usage metrics for many tools remain concentrated among early adopters rather than across most staff.
Market penetration numbers cited in the report:
Frontier AI providers intensified focus on the legal market:
At the same time, established legal-data vendors and firms are investing in model development and capacity:
These developments reflect a shift in thinking: firms and vendors are weighing which stack to depend on and whether to retain control by building or tuning models internally.
Two operational pressures are driving behavior.
The Orange Rag collects several snapshot numbers relevant to strategy discussions:
For legal leaders: treat GenAI projects as business-change efforts, not point tool installs. Clarify cost models, test security for any agent or integration, and plan the work required to move pilots into broader adoption if outcomes justify it.

The September issue of my Personal Strategy Compass newsletter is now available: “The Defense of the Baseline: Drafting Your Personal Constitution and the Re-Entry Gate.” This issue grew out of something I noticed during a recent major life transition. High-achievers rarely slow down during transitions; they simply shi

This month marks our 15th anniversary, and we could not let the occasion pass without a truly over-the-top birthday cake. (Please do not read this hungry.) Of course, the cake is only part of the fun … 😉

In this issue: Xinyue Chen, Mary Haasdyk Vooys, Henrike Lendowski, Glenda Sburelin, Adam Niklewicz, Melcher Oosterman, Ben Pearce, Susie Ang, Matt Rota, Anagh Banerjee.

The September issue of my Personal Strategy Compass newsletter is now available: “The Defense of the Baseline: Drafting Your Personal Constitution and the Re-Entry Gate.” This issue grew out of something I noticed during a recent major life transition. High-achievers rarely slow down during transitions; they simply shi
Open the issue in a new window | Read a previous edition The post The VLW Digital Edition – Sept. 28, 2026 appeared first on Virginia Lawyers Weekly .

Loading more related stories...
Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.