# What happened Instagram replaced its decade-old handwritten wordmark with a redrawn script that the company describes as bolder and simpler. The familiar gradient camera icon remains, but the in-app name lettering changed. Many viewers now read the new wordmark as "Instagzam" because one letter — the r — has an exaggerated stroke that resembles a z.
# How people are reading it Look at the new wordmark without telling yourself it says Instagram. The start of the word reads normally, but the finish trips people up. The r's stroke and the surrounding script create a shape that the brain can interpret as z. Once your brain snaps to "Instagzam," it becomes hard to see the intended spelling again.
# Why this matters in practical terms
For smaller brands or new products, ambiguous letters are riskier. If potential customers don't already know a name, unclear letterforms can cause misreading, mispronunciation, and lost recall — outcomes that undermine the investment in a brand identity.
# Is the redesign objectively bad? No — it's a tradeoff The article points out that the redesign need not be judged purely by legibility. The team deliberately preserved a handcrafted, script personality rather than switching to a generic geometric sans serif. Removing personality would make the logotype more legible but also more generic. Adding personality risks letters becoming decorative and harder to parse.
# Practical takeaways for designers and clients
- Test wordmarks at real-world sizes and contexts, including small in-app placements and quick glances. What reads perfectly at large scale may fail in app headers or thumbnails.
- Consider the client's recognition advantage. If the brand is well-known, you can push expressive letterforms further than you can for an unknown brand.
- Ambiguity can generate attention. That attention may be positive or negative, but for a global, established app it can raise awareness more effectively than a safe redesign.
# Bottom line Instagram's new script wordmark intentionally favors personality. The result is a visible legibility problem for many readers — an r that reads as z — but one the company can absorb because of its existing brand recognition. For most other organizations, the article implies, that design gamble would be much riskier.
# Closing note The redesign is a clear example of a common brand-design decision: balance uniqueness and character against the basic requirement that people can read the name quickly and correctly.