A short, practical guide for founders and leaders on recognizing the handful of employees who deliver judgment, ownership, and near-zero management overhead—and why you should create roles for them rather than lose them to org charts or compensation bands.
An Irreplaceable is someone you would rehire before knowing the exact role because you value their judgment and low management overhead more than a specific skill set.
Inventing a role is usually faster and cheaper than an external search, but it must include a written charter: one-paragraph, one metric, and a date to prevent vague “special projects” outcomes.
He offers a simple test: if this person emailed saying they were free in 30 days, would you find budget to hire them before knowing what they would do? If yes, they're Irreplaceable.
Why organizations lose Irreplaceables
Losses usually happen for rational-sounding operational reasons:
These all look defensible to a board or HR, but they remove the people who know how things actually work.
Why inventing a role is usually the better option
Compare the alternatives. An external VP search typically takes four to six months, costs recruiter fees, and has a high failure rate in the first year. Inventing a role for someone already inside is faster: they are ramped, have proven judgment, and carry no cultural risk.
Invented roles fail when they lack definition. Vagueness—special projects, fuzzy titles, no scoreboard—leads to sidelining and attrition.
If the role proves 60% right after launch, you are still likely ahead of starting a long external search.
Failure looks predictable: the title is meaningless, the metric is missing, and six months later the person feels sidelined. The fix is process discipline up front—clear deliverable, measurement, and timing—so the invented role can be assessed objectively.
Ask this week: who on your team would you rehire sight unseen? If that list is shorter than three, review recent reorgs, comp bands, and job descriptions that might have hollowed out those people's scopes. For each candidate, draft a one-paragraph role description with one metric and one date before you start a search for external talent.
Cheryl had already lost two of the 12 people on her team in the company’s first reduction in force. Then her product marketing lead resigned to join a competitor. A few weeks later, she was asked to cut two more roles. But Cheryl, the company’s chief marketing officer, was most concerned about the marketing manager who
Have you named who will fill that role when your tenured leader retires? Will you keep the position limited to one person or will you divide it and create additional roles? Which roles will be backfilled as you move people up? With succession planning in mind, these questions should be top of mind for HR […]
Who's Number One argues that the most important seat in a growing company is the one with no agreed-upon title — and that founders who never fill it end up trapped by the businesses they built. FAIRHOPE, Ala., Sept. 1, 2026 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ -- A new book released this week argues that...
Your instinct to hold on to your best people is right, but what most of us build in response is not.
Founders celebrate every new logo and route churn to a dashboard. The customer heading out the door knows something no one else in your company does.
A post by Brad Blumberg on LinkedIn week described how SaaStr runs on roughly 3 humans and 20-30+ AI agents. It was a fun summary so I thought we’d do a detailed latest dive on what each agent won’t do, where each one has broken, and which ones we’ve since killed. With two people left... Continue Reading
Loading more related stories...
Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.