Artofmanliness iconArtofmanlinessSep 29, 2026 ~2 min source read

Why Many Modern Conveniences Leave Us Feeling More Stressed

Gabe Bullard, author of Against Convenience, argues that many everyday conveniences either fail to save what they promise or remove forms of friction that made life more satisfying. This brief summarizes the podcast conversation on where convenience helps and where it hurts, plus practical questions to decide which conveniences to keep.

Podcast #1,135: Why Modern Convenience Feels So Inconvenient

Share this story

Send the public story page.

Useful takeaways from this story.

Friction can be valuable: small inconveniences sometimes preserve social contact, skill, or meaning.

Ask concrete questions about a convenience’s trade-offs before adopting it.

Intentionally reintroducing select friction can improve satisfaction and reduce stress.

# Overview

# What's the problem with convenience? Bullard's central point is twofold. First, many innovations that advertise time, money, or energy savings don't deliver those benefits in the ways we expect. Second, even when they provide efficiencies, they can eliminate everyday frictions—moments of delay, small interactions, or tasks—that previously added value, meaning, or social connection to our lives.

Examples discussed on the show include:

  • Self-checkout and mobile ordering: They can reduce face-to-face interactions and shift cognitive or physical effort onto customers. Errors or machine limitations can introduce new hassles.
  • Digital communication and streaming: Instant access multiplies options and expectations, which can increase stress and decision fatigue. Binging accessibility can reduce anticipation and the shared cultural moments older distribution systems produced.
  • Food delivery: Convenience can come with higher cost, lower quality control, and a loss of incidental social rituals tied to shopping or dining out.
  • Smartphone cameras: They create an expectation to document rather than experience some moments, and they change what we notice and remember.

# Practical framework for choosing conveniences Bullard offers a question-driven approach to decide whether to adopt or keep a convenience. Use concrete, practical questions rather than abstract ideals:

  • Does it reliably save me measurable time, money, or energy, or does it shift the burden elsewhere?
  • What social or skill-based frictions does it remove? Are those frictions worth preserving? For example, a cashier interaction may be brief but socially meaningful.
  • What new frictions or hidden costs does it introduce (errors, surveillance, decision overhead)?
  • How does it affect the quality of the outcome or experience? Convenience that reduces quality may not be worth it.

# When to add friction back The conversation stresses that reintroducing friction can be deliberate and selective. Examples include choosing to check out with a person at a store to support local workers and preserve human connection, or leaving a smartphone in a pocket during conversations or outings to focus on presence. The goal is not to reject all efficiency but to align convenience choices with how you want to spend time, attention, and money.

# Takeaway actions for readers

  • Audit routine conveniences: List the services and tools you use daily and run them through the practical questions above.
  • Try short experiments: Use a non-digital or less convenient option for a week to surface what you lose or gain.
  • Prioritize where friction matters: Keep conveniences that clearly save resources without hollowing out quality or social value.

# Context and source Host: Brett McKay. Producer: Kate McKay. Guest: Gabe Bullard, author of Against Convenience. Episode published September 29, 2026, on The Art of Manliness podcast (Episode 1,135).

More context around this story.

My excellent Conversation with Annie Lowrey
Marginalrevolution iconMarginalrevolutionSep 17, 2026

My excellent Conversation with Annie Lowrey

Here is the audio, video, and transcript. Here is the episode summary: Annie Lowrey’s new book, The Time Tax, argues that the most regressive levy in American life is the hours each of us must spend on hold, in waiting rooms, and filling out forms a competent state would have pre-filled — roughly fifty a year […] The p

The Power of Constraints
Kellynolan iconKellynolanSep 15, 2026

The Power of Constraints

To listen to Apple, click here; to listen on Spotify, click here. We tend to treat limited time and energy as the enemy – something to push against, work around, or refuse to acknowledge. But embracing constraints doesn’t slow you down or hamper your ambition. I’d argue it forces clarity, creativity, and progress in wa

Loading more related stories...

Keep reading in the app

Open the app view to save this story, compare related coverage, and continue from the same source.

Open in app